Skip to content

Renewable Energy Use Across Selected Countries in the Americas, 2021

WorldDataRank / Energy

Compare Renewable Energy Use across 20 selected countries in the Americas using World Bank data for 2021. Values are measured in % of total final energy consumption.

Data year: 2021 Source: World Bank Last refreshed:

The latest sufficiently complete World Bank data for the selected countries is from 2021. Retrieval date and data year are different; no newer values are inferred.

Key findings

  • Guatemala has the highest observed value at 62.1%.
  • Argentina has the lowest observed value at 9.2%.
  • The median across 20 reporting countries is 26.1%.
  • The difference between the highest and lowest values is 52.9 percentage points.
Top 10 · Renewable Energy Use · 2021

Comparison across selected countries in the Americas. Values in % of total final energy consumption. Bar lengths start at zero; the table below provides the same observations.

  • 1. Guatemala 62.1%
    Guatemala: 62.1%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 2. Paraguay 58.8%
    Paraguay: 58.8%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 3. Uruguay 57.8%
    Uruguay: 57.8%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 4. Nicaragua 50.4%
    Nicaragua: 50.4%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 5. Brazil 46.5%
    Brazil: 46.5%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 6. Honduras 45.9%
    Honduras: 45.9%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 7. Costa Rica 34.2%
    Costa Rica: 34.2%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 8. Peru 30.6%
    Peru: 30.6%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 9. Colombia 29.7%
    Colombia: 29.7%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 10. Panama 28%
    Panama: 28%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.

Complete selected-country ranking

Complete selected-country ranking — % of total final energy consumption
RankCountryValue
1Guatemala62.1%
2Paraguay58.8%
3Uruguay57.8%
4Nicaragua50.4%
5Brazil46.5%
6Honduras45.9%
7Costa Rica34.2%
8Peru30.6%
9Colombia29.7%
10Panama28%
11Chile24.2%
12Canada23.8%
13El Salvador21.9%
14Cuba20.9%
15Ecuador18.9%
16Dominican Republic14.8%
17Mexico13%
18Bolivia12.8%
19United States10.9%
20Argentina9.2%

What the data shows

The unweighted country mean is 30.7%, compared with a median of 26.1%. Each reporting country has equal weight; this is not a population-weighted or regional aggregate. The gap between the two highest observed values is 3.3 percentage points. These comparisons describe the observations and do not establish causes.

Methodology

Provider
World Bank
Dataset
Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption)
Indicator ID
EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS
Data year
2021
Units
% of total final energy consumption
Coverage
20 of 20 selected countries in the Americas.

Source: World Bank: Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption) (2021)

Rankings use the cited source values without imputation or interpolation. Display rounding does not affect rank.

Technical details
Coverage threshold
Minimum 18 reporting countries.
Countries included
Guatemala, Paraguay, Uruguay, Nicaragua, Brazil, Honduras, Costa Rica, Peru, Colombia, Panama, Chile, Canada, El Salvador, Cuba, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Bolivia, United States, Argentina
Countries excluded (missing observations; ISO3 codes)
None
Ranking direction
descending
Sorting
Exact source values; equal values share competition rank. Ties display by ascending country ID, then record ID.
Statistics
Unweighted arithmetic mean, median, and highest minus lowest. Derived decimals use half-up rounding; source values remain exact.

Why a newer year was not selected

  • 2026: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2025: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2024: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2023: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2022: 0 available observations; 18 required.

Caveats

This is a selected-country comparison, not a global ranking. Missing countries may affect the distribution. A higher value does not necessarily imply a better outcome. Source observations may be revised.