Skip to content

Fossil Electricity Share Across Selected Countries in the Americas, 2022

WorldDataRank / Energy

Compare Fossil Electricity Share across 20 selected countries in the Americas using World Bank data for 2022. Values are measured in % of total electricity production.

Data year: 2022 Source: World Bank Last refreshed:

The latest sufficiently complete World Bank data for the selected countries is from 2022. Retrieval date and data year are different; no newer values are inferred.

Key findings

  • Cuba has the highest observed value at 95.9%.
  • Paraguay has the lowest observed value at 0%.
  • The median across 20 reporting countries is 29.8%.
  • The difference between the highest and lowest values is 95.9 percentage points.
Top 10 · Fossil Electricity Share · 2022

Comparison across selected countries in the Americas. Values in % of total electricity production. Bar lengths start at zero; the table below provides the same observations.

  • 1. Cuba 95.9%
    Cuba: 95.9%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 2. Dominican Republic 84.4%
    Dominican Republic: 84.4%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 3. Mexico 68.6%
    Mexico: 68.6%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 4. Bolivia 63.4%
    Bolivia: 63.4%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 5. Argentina 60.9%
    Argentina: 60.9%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 6. United States 60%
    United States: 60%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 7. Chile 44.7%
    Chile: 44.7%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 8. Peru 44.6%
    Peru: 44.6%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 9. Honduras 40.5%
    Honduras: 40.5%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.
  • 10. Nicaragua 35.5%
    Nicaragua: 35.5%Bar length relative to the largest value in this chart.

Complete selected-country ranking

Complete selected-country ranking — % of total electricity production
RankCountryValue
1Cuba95.9%
2Dominican Republic84.4%
3Mexico68.6%
4Bolivia63.4%
5Argentina60.9%
6United States60%
7Chile44.7%
8Peru44.6%
9Honduras40.5%
10Nicaragua35.5%
11Colombia24.2%
12Ecuador23.9%
13Guatemala23.6%
14Panama22.8%
15El Salvador22.1%
16Canada17.9%
17Brazil9.8%
18Uruguay8.9%
19Costa Rica0.7%
20Paraguay0%

What the data shows

The unweighted country mean is 37.6%, compared with a median of 29.8%. Each reporting country has equal weight; this is not a population-weighted or regional aggregate. The gap between the two highest observed values is 11.5 percentage points. These comparisons describe the observations and do not establish causes.

Methodology

Provider
World Bank
Dataset
Electricity production from oil, gas and coal sources (% of total)
Indicator ID
EG.ELC.FOSL.ZS
Data year
2022
Units
% of total electricity production
Coverage
20 of 20 selected countries in the Americas.

Source: World Bank: Electricity production from oil, gas and coal sources (% of total) (2022)

Rankings use the cited source values without imputation or interpolation. Display rounding does not affect rank.

Technical details
Coverage threshold
Minimum 18 reporting countries.
Countries included
Cuba, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Bolivia, Argentina, United States, Chile, Peru, Honduras, Nicaragua, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, El Salvador, Canada, Brazil, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Paraguay
Countries excluded (missing observations; ISO3 codes)
None
Ranking direction
descending
Sorting
Exact source values; equal values share competition rank. Ties display by ascending country ID, then record ID.
Statistics
Unweighted arithmetic mean, median, and highest minus lowest. Derived decimals use half-up rounding; source values remain exact.

Why a newer year was not selected

  • 2026: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2025: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2024: 0 available observations; 18 required.
  • 2023: 10 available observations; 18 required.

Caveats

This is a selected-country comparison, not a global ranking. Missing countries may affect the distribution. A higher value does not necessarily imply a better outcome. Source observations may be revised.